Jan Choinski vs Eliot Spizzirri Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recent second serve points won show Spizzirri at 45.92% and Choinski slightly ahead at 46.51%. Could this marginal difference indicate a competitive edge?
• In return games, Spizzirri excels, securing 48.24% of opponents' second serve points and 28.42% on first serves, outpacing Choinski who holds 41.7% and 25.81% respectively.
• Under pressure, Choinski has saved 57.65% of breakpoints compared to Spizzirri's 52.41%, which might influence game momentum in tight spots.
• Performance over the past year favors Spizzirri with a 62.35% win rate, while Choinski stands at 50.88%.
• Surface preference shows Spizzirri thriving on Hard at 64%, whereas Choinski's strengths lie on Clay with a 62% win rate.
• Both players predominantly compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments; Spizzirri's win rate is slightly better at 60.34% vs Choinski's 53.06%.
• Average opponent ranks are comparable, with Spizzirri facing players at an average rank of 257.44, similar to Choinski's 259.89.
• In deciding sets, Spizzirri is strong, winning 71% of these tight encounters, while Choinski has won 58%.
• When converting breakpoints, Choinski leads with 35.8%, surpassing Spizzirri who converts at 30.8%.

Editorial Prediction (June 16, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match presents a close competition, with both players showcasing strengths in different facets of their game. Spizzirri demonstrates superior return game capabilities, potentially allowing for more break opportunities. Conversely, Choinski's ability to save breakpoints under pressure might be crucial in staying competitive during pivotal moments of the match.

Choinski holds a slight advantage in second serve performance and breakpoint conversion, suggesting resilience in critical situations. However, Spizzirri's higher win rate over the past year and proficiency in deciding sets could provide the needed edge in sustaining momentum across the match.

Given these factors, Spizzirri's overall performance trend, with notable strengths in returns and decisive closing ability, slightly favors him as the likely victor in this match-up.